Price Controls: When Politicians Try to Fix Markets

Price Controls: When Politicians Try to Fix Markets (And Why It Usually Backfires)

Ever wondered why your rent keeps going up despite all the politicians promising to "fix" housing? Or why farmers are always moaning about prices? Welcome to the wild world of price controls - where good intentions meet economic reality, and reality usually wins.

The Great Price Control Soap Opera in IB Economics

You're scrolling through TikTok when you see yet another video about how rent in London has hit an eye-watering average of £2,235 per month. Your mate's parents are proper stressed because their landlord just whacked up the rent by £200. Meanwhile, your uncle who farms potatoes in Yorkshire is having a right moan about how the price of spuds barely covers his costs.

Sound familiar? This is where politicians swoop in like superheroes, promising to save the day with price controls. But here's the thing - economics doesn't care about your feelings, and markets have a habit of fighting back in ways that would make a Marvel villain jealous.

• Internal Assessment (IA) Guide – Free Download
  Step-by-step support on topic selection, structure, evaluation, and most common IB Economics IA mistakes.

• Understanding key IB Economics Internal Assessment concepts

• Applying and explaining them in real-world IB Economics contexts

• Building IB Economics IA confidence without drowning in dry theory and explanations.

Download the IA guide now for free and boost your IB Economics grades and confidence:

When Renters Win in IB Economics: The Price Ceiling Chronicles

Let's start with price ceilings - these are laws that basically tell prices "you shall not pass!" (imagine Gandalf, but for IB Economics). The classic example? Rent control.

Right now in the UK, we're seeing this play out in real-time. The SNP government limited rent increases and banned evictions between September 2022 and April 2024, whilst rents increased 7.8% annually to £1,386 a month in England, rose 8.9% to £792 in Wales and 5.7% to £1,001 in Scotland. It's like watching a slow-motion car crash, but with more complicated graphs.

When politicians impose a price ceiling below the market equilibrium (that sweet spot where supply meets demand), they're essentially playing economic whack-a-mole. Sure, you've stopped prices from rising, but now you've got a massive shortage of properties because:

• Quantity demanded > Quantity supplied (basic maths, innit?)

• Landlords think "sod this" and convert flats to Airbnbs or sell up

• New housing development slows to a crawl because the returns are not worth the hassle

The Unintended Consequences (IB Economics in disguise)

Remember how I said markets fight back? Here's where it gets interesting. Housing quality declines because if a landlord can't recoup the costs to make the home in a desired condition then the landlord won't make the repairs.

Think of it like this: If you can only sell your iPhone for £50 regardless of whether it's brand new or completely knackered, are you going to bother keeping it in mint condition? Exactly.

Plus, you get all sorts of creative workarounds:

• Massive queues for decent flats (hello, 2-hour viewings!)

• Hidden fees that make budget airlines look honest

• "Key money" and other dodgy practices

• The dreaded "sorry, already taken" after you've spent your entire Saturday flat-hunting

When Farmers Win in IB Economics: The Price Floor Fiasco

Price floors - where the government says "prices can't fall below this level." This is typically what happens when farmers and their political mates have a good old chinwag.

In the US, Republicans in Congress have plans to spend $50 billion over the next decade to raise price floors for major agricultural products such as corn, wheat, soybeans, cotton and peanuts. That's a lot of cash to keep farmers happy, but here's the rub...

When you set a price floor above equilibrium:

• Quantity supplied > Quantity demanded (farmers produce loads, consumers buy less)

• You get massive surpluses (think mountains of butter in the EU - yes, that was actually a thing!)

• Governments end up buying the excess (using your tax money, cheers very much)

Real Talk for your IB Economics Course: The European Butter Mountain

Back in the day, the EU's Common Agricultural Policy created such massive food surpluses that they literally had a "butter mountain" and a "wine lake." I'm not making this up - they had so much excess butter they were storing it in warehouses across Europe. It's like hoarding in your bedroom, but with dairy products and on a continental scale.

The "We'll Help Everyone" Disaster

Here's where it gets absolutely insane. Some governments have tried to help both sides simultaneously - keeping prices low for consumers AND high for producers. It's like trying to text two different people you fancy at the same time - it never ends well.

The old Soviet Union tried this approach and basically bankrupted themselves. They subsidised everything to the point where the government was spending more money than a Love Island contestant in the villa shop. The result? Economic chaos that made the 2008 disaster look like a minor inconvenience.

IB Economics Inside Info, Why Politicians Love Price Controls (And Economists Don't)

Politicians adore price controls because:

• They look like they're "doing something" without spending tax money upfront

• They can blame the inevitable problems on "greedy landlords" or "market forces"

• The costs are hidden, so voters don't immediately connect the dots

Meanwhile, economists are in the corner having a proper strop because:

• They're inefficient - resources don't go where they're most needed

• They're unfair - help goes to everyone, not just to those who need it

• They create deadweight loss - fancy term for "economic waste that helps nobody"

It's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut, but the nut survives and your kitchen is destroyed.

Better Ways to Fix Things in IB Economics (That Actually Work)

Instead of messing about with prices, governments could:

For housing:

• Build more social housing (revolutionary, I know) The Netherlands has the highest percentage of social housing in Europe (30-33% of the total housing stock available). Austria (around 24%), Norway (around 23%), and Denmark (around 20%). That sounds more like really helping people.

• Give housing vouchers to people who actually need help

• Reform planning laws so we can actually build decent homes

For farming:

• Direct income support for struggling farmers

• Investment in agricultural technology and sustainability (help them become more productive)

• Support for local food networks

These approaches are more transparent, targeted, and don't create the economic equivalent of a Rube Goldberg machine.

For access to all IB Economics exam practice questions, model answers, IB Economics complete diagrams together with full explanations, and detailed assessment criteria, explore the Complete IB Economics Course:

The Bottom Line for your IB Economics Course

Price controls are like trying to control the weather by shouting at clouds - it might make you feel better, but you'll still get rained on. Markets are powerful forces that will find ways around any artificial barriers you put up, often in ways that make the original problem worse.

With fewer landlords in the market, rental prices continued to soar. Some tenants now face increases of up to £200 per month, highlighting the growing affordability crisis. This perfectly illustrates how price controls often create the opposite of their intended effect.

The real lesson? IB Economics isn't about being mean or uncaring - it's about understanding how incentives work and what happens when you try to fight basic human behaviour. Sometimes the best way to help people is to let markets do their thing whilst providing targeted support where it's actually needed.

So next time a politician promises to "cap" or "fix" prices, remember: they might have good intentions, but the road to economic hell is paved with price controls. Markets always find a way to bite back, and usually, it's the people they're trying to help who get hurt the most.

Stay well