Why Globalisation Isn't the Villain Or the Hero You Think It Is
Debunking 3 major globalisation myths with current examples. IB Economics students - get the real story behind trade wars, poverty reduction & supply chains. Updated 2025!"
IB ECONOMICS HLIB ECONOMICSIB ECONOMICS SLIB ECONOMICS THE GLOBAL ECONOMY / INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Lawrence Robert
7/27/20258 min read


Why Globalisation Isn't the Villain (Or the Hero) You Think It Is
Right, let's talk about globalisation. I know, I know - it sounds about as exciting as listening to your parents explain how "things were different in their day." But stick with me here, because globalisation is basically like the ultimate reality TV show, complete with trade wars, economic mix-ups, and more theatrics than one of your favourite TV programmes Love Island.
What IS Globalisation?
Imagine you wake up, check your iPhone (designed in California, assembled in China), throw on some Zara clothes (Spanish company, probably made in Bangladesh), grab a coffee from your local Costa (British chain, using beans from Colombia), and scroll through TikTok (Chinese app, American servers, global content). Before 9 AM, you've already participated in globalisation about fifteen times.
Globalisation is basically the world's biggest group project - it's all the tech, economic policies, and political changes that have made it dead easy to trade goods, services, and ideas across borders. Think of it as the world's most successful dating app, but for countries and companies.
So technically, globalisation is the cluster of technological, economic, and political innovations that have drastically reduced barriers to exchange of goods, services, and ideas across borders.
But globalisation is more controversial than pineapple on pizza. Some people reckon it's brilliant for making everyone richer, whilst others think it's rubbish that only helps the already-wealthy. So who's right?
The Theory: Why Globalisation Should Make Everyone Better Off
IB Economics theory suggests globalisation helps reduce poverty through four main channels. Let me break this down with some examples you'll actually remember:
1. Comparative Advantage ("Stay in Your Lane, But Make It Global")
Remember David Ricardo's comparative advantage? It's like when you and your mate are doing a group project - you're brilliant at research but rubbish at PowerPoint, whilst they're the opposite. So you divide the work and both end up with better grades.
Countries do this too. South Korea absolutely smashed it with smartphones and cars (ever heard of Samsung or Hyundai?), whilst Saudi Arabia stuck to what it does best - oil. By 2024, global trade hit a whopping £26 trillion because countries figured out their strengths and ran with them.
2. Capital Goes Where It's Wanted Most
This one's like Tinder for money - capital swipes right on countries that offer the best returns. Back in 2011, the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China) were getting all the attention from foreign investors.
But by 2022, the US became the ultimate catch, pulling in £307 billion in foreign investment, whilst China got £142 billion. Why the change? Well, turns out geopolitical factors affect dating apps AND international investment. Who knew?
3. Bigger Markets = More Innovation
When your potential market goes from your local town to literally the entire planet, suddenly it's worth investing big money in new ideas. It's like how Spotify wouldn't exist if they could only sell to Swedish music lovers - they needed the whole world to make streaming profitable.
4. Economic Peace Theory
Countries that trade together rarely fight each other - it's bad for business. European defence spending dropped from over 3% of GDP to under 2% as the EU got stronger, because it's hard to start a war with someone who for instance, makes your car parts.
Though recent events (looking at you, Russia-Ukraine war) have reminded us this isn't foolproof...
Myth-Busting Time: Three Massive Misconceptions About Globalisation
Myth 1: "Globalisation Forces Countries into a Race to the Bottom"
The Story: Some bloke called Thomas Friedman wrote a book claiming globalisation was like a "golden straitjacket" - countries had to choose between free markets or becoming North Korea. The idea is that mobile capital becomes all powerful, forcing governments to slash regulations and taxes or lose all their investment.
The Reality Check: This is about as accurate as saying Love Island contestants are there "for genuine connections."
Here's what actually happens: Two-thirds of global investment still goes to countries with big governments, high taxes, and strict regulations. Shocking, right? Turns out investors want things like good infrastructure, educated and skilled workers, and legal systems that actually work - not just the cheapest possible labour.
Take Germany - massive social safety net, high taxes, strict environmental rules, and yet it's an absolute magnet for investment because German engineering is legendary. Meanwhile, countries with rock-bottom wages often struggle to attract quality investment.
Real-world evidence: Cultural diversity has actually increased thanks to globalisation. Before Amazon and Spotify, you could only buy what was in your local HMV shop. Now you can discover obscure bands from Iceland or buy handmade jewellery from Ghana. The internet didn't create cultural uniformity - it created infinite niches.
Myth 2: "Globalisation Destroys Jobs in Rich Countries"
The Story: All the good manufacturing jobs are shipping off to China and Vietnam, leaving British and American workers with nothing but minimum-wage service jobs. Cue the dramatic music and newspaper headlines about "deindustrialisation."
The Reality Check: This one's partially true but massively oversimplified - like saying "social media causes depression" when the actual relationship is way more complex.
What's really happening with wages: Yes, the gap between productivity and wages has grown like your younger sibling's TikTok following - productivity has grown eight times faster than typical worker pay since 1979. But globalisation isn't the only villain here. Technology, declining union membership (from 35% to 6% in the US), and domestic policies all play major roles.
The Great Outsourcing Argument: Remember all the panic about call centres moving to India? Well, 69% of US manufacturers are now bringing production back home as of 2024. Why? COVID taught everyone that having your entire supply chain in one country is like putting all your eggs in one very fragile basket.
Mexico is having a moment: Mexico overtook China as America's biggest trading partner in 2024 thanks to "nearshoring" - companies want suppliers close enough for weekend visits, not a 14-hour flight away.
Service exports are thriving: Rich countries actually run a surplus of over £80 billion in business services. For every pound spent on outsourcing, the domestic economy gets back about £1.12. Not exactly the economic apocalypse we were promised.
Myth 3: "Globalisation Only Helps the Rich"
The Story: The super-wealthy get mega-rich from global markets whilst the poor get poorer. Jeff Bezos builds rocket ships whilst your part-time job still doesn't pay enough for a deposit on a flat.
The Reality Check: This is the most complicated one because there are two different things happening at once - like how you can simultaneously love and hate your little brother.
The inequality bit (unfortunately true): Global markets do create "winner-take-all" situations. If you're brilliant at something and can sell to the whole world, you become stupidly rich. Think Cristiano Ronaldo earning more from Instagram posts than most countries' GDP, or tech founders becoming billionaires because their apps get used by literally everyone.
Financial crises and recessions hit the poor hardest too. COVID-19 pushed global extreme poverty up to 9.7% in 2020 - the first increase in decades.
But here's the massive poverty reduction story: Ready for some genuinely mind-blowing stats?
Global extreme poverty fell from 40% in 1990 to 8.5% in 2024
That's over 1 billion people lifted out of absolute poverty
China alone lifted 800 million people out of poverty – the fastest poverty reduction in human history
Real examples: In Bangladesh, the textile industry (yes, the one making your H&M clothes) has transformed the economy. Female labour force participation jumped from 4% to 36%, and GDP per capita tripled. Vietnam went from one of the world's poorest countries to a middle-income success story, largely through becoming part of global manufacturing supply chains.
But - and this is crucial - Sub-Saharan Africa still accounts for 67% of people in extreme poverty despite being only 16% of global population. The benefits aren't automatically distributed fairly.
How Recent Events Changed Everything
The US-China Trade War Saga
Remember when Trump and Xi Jinping were basically having a Twitter beef but with actual economic consequences? By 2025, the US had slapped 145% tariffs on Chinese goods, whilst China retaliated with 125% tariffs on American products.
This isn't just numbers on a spreadsheet - it's reshaping global supply chains faster than you can say "TikTok ban." Companies are frantically looking for alternatives to Chinese production, leading to Vietnam, India, and Mexico becoming the new cool kids in global manufacturing.
COVID-19: The Great Supply Chain Wake-Up Call
The pandemic was like a massive stress test for globalisation, and in some areas, it proper failed. Remember the great toilet paper shortage of 2020? Or when you couldn't get a PlayStation 5 for love nor money?
COVID showed that having everything made in one place is like having only one phone charger – fine until something goes wrong. Now 90% of supply chain executives say their CEO actually understands how important supply chains are (only took a global pandemic!).
The Reshoring Revolution
Manufacturing is coming home! Well, some of it anyway. 60% of American and European companies are relocating suppliers closer to home. It's like when you realise shopping at the local corner shop is actually more convenient than trekking to the massive out-of-town supermarket.
Ford is building a massive electric vehicle plant in Tennessee that'll create 6,000 jobs. Volvo is opening its first European plant in 60 years. Even Apple is diversifying away from China, with suppliers setting up shop in Vietnam and India.
Every episode of Pint-Sized links back to what matters most for your IB Economics course:
Understanding key IB Economics concepts
Applying them in real-world IB Economics contexts
Building IB Economics course confidence without drowning in dry theory.
Subscribe for free to exclusive episodes designed to boost your IB Economics grades and confidence:
Real-World Examples That'll Stick in Your Brain
Success Stories:
South Korea's K-Wave: From making cheap knockoffs in the 1980s to Squid Game, BTS, and Samsung Galaxy phones dominating global culture and tech. Korean cultural exports hit £10 billion in 2022 - not bad for a country smaller than England.
Rwanda's Coffee Revolution: Once known only for tragic reasons, Rwanda now produces some of the world's premium coffee. Global trade connections helped farmers access international markets, increasing their incomes by 300%.
The Complicated Cases:
China's Rise: Lifted 800 million people out of poverty but also created massive inequality. Jack Ma went from English teacher to billionaire, whilst factory workers still earn a fraction of Western wages.
Nigeria's Oil Curse: Despite massive oil exports, 40% of Nigerians still live in poverty. Turns out having one valuable export isn't enough if the benefits don't trickle down.
What This Means for Your IB Economics Course (And Real Life)
Here's the bottom line that'll get you top marks in your IB Economics exams:
Globalisation isn't inherently good or evil - it's a tool that amplifies existing systems. If your institutions are decent, it helps. If they're rubbish, it can make things worse.
The three myths are still myths, but the evidence has evolved. Use current and updated IB Economics examples in your essays - examiners love to see you're not just regurgitating textbook examples from 2010.
Context matters massively. A policy that works brilliantly for South Korea might be disastrous for Somalia. Always consider domestic institutions, governance quality, and starting conditions.
Recent disruptions haven't killed globalisation, they've just made it more complex. Trade wars, pandemics, and climate change are reshaping how countries integrate, not whether they integrate.
The Takeaway
Globalisation is like social media - it connects people in amazing ways and can spread good ideas rapidly, but it can also amplify inequality and create new problems. The key isn't to delete the app entirely; it's to use it more thoughtfully.
For your exams, remember: nuance gets marks. Don't write IB Economics essays saying globalisation is brilliant or terrible - explain how it's both, with specific examples of when and why. Show you understand the complexity, and you'll stand out from students who just memorise pros and cons lists.
The world is more connected than ever, but also more complicated. And honestly? That makes IB economics way more interesting than it was when younger generations were studying it.
For access to all IB Economics exam practice questions, model answers, IB Economics complete diagrams together with full explanations, and detailed assessment criteria, explore the Complete IB Economics Course:
Problems with your IB Economics Internal Assessment? Find a Solution Here for Free:
IB Complete Support Courses, a new generation of affordable support materials directed at IB students seeking grades 6 or 7.
© Theibtrainer.com 2012-2025. All rights reserved.